The Intricacies of Finding the Perpetrator

There is no certainty in suspicion; there is no such thing as ‘this definitely cannot happen’ or ‘this person definitely wouldn’t do it.’ Likewise, in illuminating incidents and collecting evidence, the circle is expanded starting with the person closest to the victim, who is assumed to be definitely not involved. It is proven by experience that, in general, those whom we say ‘they definitely wouldn’t do it’ turn out to be the culprits, and these culprits do not neglect to participate in the investigation and search for the perpetrator.

In the processes of clarifying crimes and identifying perpetrators, it is never correct to talk about certainty. In the stages of revealing the aspects of incidents that remain in the dark and collecting evidence, attention should also be paid to individuals who are thought to be unlikely to be perpetrators. Because, during the examination of events, all kinds of possibilities should be considered. In this process, the suspicion circle is expanded starting from the person closest to the victim and no detail should be overlooked.

Past experiences have shown that, often, the individuals we think ‘they definitely wouldn’t do it’ can indeed turn out to be guilty. Therefore, it is important to evaluate all possibilities without prejudice and impartially. Prejudices against individuals can lead to the misinterpretation of evidence and the obscuring of crimes. Hence, for the sake of justice, it is necessary to approach every suspect equally and act with an impartial perspective.

In judicial processes, even the smallest detail that is overlooked in the research and searches to identify the perpetrator can lead to significant results. Therefore, even the slightest suspicion should be carefully examined and all possibilities should be considered until its correctness is confirmed. The concept of suspicion plays a key role in illuminating incidents and every step taken in this process is of great importance for justice to prevail.

In conclusion, there is no such thing as ‘this definitely cannot happen’ or ‘this person definitely wouldn’t do it’ in suspicion. Likewise, in illuminating incidents and collecting evidence, the circle is expanded starting with the person closest to the victim, who is assumed to be definitely not involved. It is proven by experience that, in general, those whom we say ‘they definitely wouldn’t do it’ turn out to be the culprits, and these culprits do not neglect to participate in the investigation and search for the perpetrator.